Transforms
The following table specifies the transforms supported by API Mesh and the version of each transform:
Transform | Version |
---|---|
0.4.21 | |
0.11.14 | |
0.15.23 | |
0.13.22 | |
0.12.22 | |
0.14.22 | |
0.4.20 | |
0.5.20 |
See Transforms if you would like more information on transforms in the context of API Mesh.
Introduction to transforms
API Mesh allows you to modify the schema easily, to control the contents of your GraphQL requests and responses; you can use one of the built-in transforms or write your own.
Each transformer can manipulate the schema the way it needs and return the modified schema.
Transforms are specified as a list of objects, and they are executed in order. You can apply them over a specific input source, or over the unified schema (after merging all sources).
Handler-level transforms
Most of the previous Guides configured Transforms at the root of the mesh.json
configuration.
Copied to your clipboard{"sources": [{"name": "Books","handler": {"openapi": {"source": "https://api.apis.guru/v2/specs/wikimedia.org/1.0.0/swagger.yaml"}},"transforms": [{"prefix": {"value": "Wiki_"}}]}]}
However, Mesh Transforms can be specified at the Source or Root level as follows:
Copied to your clipboard{"sources": [{"name": "Books","handler": {"openapi": {"baseUrl": "https://my-service-url/","source": "../books-service/openapi3-definition.json"}},"transforms": null},{"rename": {"renames": [{"from": {"type": "Query","field": "categories"},"to": {"type": "Query","field": "booksCategories"}}]}},{"name": "Authors","handler": {"grpc": {"endpoint": "https://my-service-url/","protoFilePath": "../authors-service/proto/authors/v1/authors_service.proto"}}},{"name": "Stores","handler": {"graphql": {"endpoint": "https://my-service-url/graphql"}}}],"transforms": [{"filterSchema": {"filters": ["Query.stores"]}}]}
Specifying transforms at the Source level helps to isolate each Source definition better.
Transforms performed at the Source level or Root level do not result in the same final SDK that you might potentially use later in additionalResolvers
.
The diagram below explains how the Mesh process is applied when building the final unified Schema and SDK:
The above diagram highlights 2 important points when working with transforms:
Transforms order is important
The sequence diagram shows that Mesh always applies transforms in order, which means a given transformer can impact the following one.
Given the following MyService
schema:
Copied to your clipboardtype Query {books_list: [Book]!}# …
The following filterSchema
transforms configuration will fail:
Copied to your clipboard{"sources": {"name": "MyService","handler": {"JsonSchema": null},"transforms": [{"namingConvention": {"typeNames": "pascalCase","fieldNames": "camelCase"}},{"filterSchema": ["Query.books_list"]}]}}
Because the Mesh processes transforms in the order they are defined, when filterSchema
is processed, all types and fields have been transformed to match the configured naming convention.
The Query.books_list
does not exist anymore, replaced by the Query.booksList
query.
The number of configured transforms does not impact performances (build or runtime) since Mesh processes them in a chained way
Beware of which transforms are used at the source level
As stated earlier, transforms applied at the source level impact the generated SDK.
For this reason, be careful when using the filterSchema
transforms at the Source level since it will also remove it from the SDK, which will make it impossible to use it at the additional resolvers level.
For example:
Copied to your clipboard{"sources": {"name": "MyService","handler": {"JsonSchema": null},"transforms": [{"filterSchema": ["Query.books_list"]}]}}
The above filterSchema
Transforms will prevent calling the books_list
Query SDK method from additionalResolvers
.
(The MyService.Query.books_list()
SDK method won't be generated)
Two different modes
By default, most transform manipulating schemas work by wrapping the original schema. Still, recently we have also introduced a new bare
mode to replace the original schema with the transformed one.
Although both bare
and wrap
modes achieve the same result, their behaviors are very different.
Let's take a look at how they operate.
wrap
wrap
mode adds significant overhead and can cause longer processing times. When using API Mesh, we strongly recommend using Bare mode.
The wrap mode applies transformations by adding a wrapping layer to the original GraphQL schema. The handler generates a GraphQL
schema and passes it to the transform. When in wrap
mode, the transform receives this schema. Rather than updating it, it will apply a layer on top of it, with the scope of serving your transformations as an addition to the original schema generated by the handler.
This approach is safe as we have used it extensively in graphql-tools
; however, be mindful of the implications below.
Implications
The wrap
mode is the default mode for schema manipulation transforms because it is safe and works across all data sources. However, you might want to be aware of the following implications.
Runtime implications
Schema wrapping is performed during initialization only and so won't affect runtime GraphQL operations. However, transforms that alter the original schema shape using
wrap
mode, achieve this by intercepting both the incoming request and the original response to do the mapping required to transform the original schema into the desired shape.Not all transforms require interception of both request and response. Some require straightforward mapping, so the runtime overhead could hopefully be negligible; however, there will always be some.
Multiple wrapping layers
When using
wrap
mode, the required transformation can be achieved by adding at least one wrapping layer per each transform rule defined. We cannot have a wrapping layer per transform, but we need one per rule since each rule is unique in the way it transforms different parts of the schema. Some rules might even require multiple wrapping layers, f.i. When transforming a field, the transform needs to be applied to RootFields, ObjectFields, and InputObjectFields.As explained in the previous point, the wrapping layers are registered during initialization only. However, each wrapping layer will always have some runtime implications, even if hopefully negligible.
Working with fixed-schema sources
As mentioned,
wrap
is the only mode that works for sources that "speak" GraphQL natively. However, when you work with fixed schema sources, such as JSON-schema, OpenApi, or SOAP. Schema wrapping might have some undesired effects. For example, you won't have access to the original "fixed-contract" response from your data source.This might not be ideal, for example, when implementing custom resolvers, where you might want to access several properties returned by your REST service to compute custom data. Still, you will only be able to access properties requested with the GraphQL query.
If you don't want/can't opt into
bare
mode, this can be easily solved by explicitly declaring aSelectionSet
, within your custom resolver to list all properties required to compute your custom data.
wrap
is the only approach that works with data sources that already "speaks" GraphQL, or when you want to transform all sources at the (root) level unless you're using merger-bare. If you want to remove the possible runtime implications, consider either moving your transforms from the data source level or opting into merger-bare
to take advantage of bare
mode.
Example:
Copied to your clipboard{"sources": [{"name": "Countries","handler": {"graphql": {"endpoint": "https://api.../graphql"}},"transforms": [{"rename": {"mode": "wrap","renames": [{"from": {"type": "Country","field": "admin1Admins"},"to": {"type": "Country","field": "admin1"}}]}}]},{"name": "Users","handler": {"openapi": {"source": "https://api.../swagger.yaml"}},"transforms": [{"rename": {"mode": "wrap","renames": [{"from": {"type": "User","field": "lastName"},"to": {"type": "User","field": "surname"}}]}}]}],"transforms": [{"rename": {"mode": "wrap","renames": [{"from": {"type": "Country","field": "ISO-3166_Code"},"to": {"type": "Country","field": "code"}}]}}]}
When you want to use wrap
, you can omit the mode
property since this is already applied by default.
bare
Bare is a recent addition and works by replacing the original schema. The handler generates a GraphQL schema and passes it to the transform. When in bare
mode, the transform, receives the schema generated by your handler, applies the defined transform rules, and returns an updated version of the original schema.
This means that the transformed schema replaces the original schema from the handler and so Mesh deals with the latter schema only, as opposed to an original schema plus one or more wrapping layers.
bare
mode does remove all the implications of wrap
mode, however, be mindful of the restrictions below.
Restrictions
bare
mode does provide performance improvements over wrap
mode, however, it needs to access the bare schema. Here are some reasons this might not work:
Your data source already "speaks" GraphQL
bare
won't work since it cannot replace a native GraphQL schema. This is not the same as transforming a "translated" GraphQL schema (e.g. from JSON-schema, OpenApi, SOAP, etc.). Instead, we suggest that you apply thewrap
transforms to your GraphQL data source andbare
transforms to sources "translated" into GraphQL.You are applying transforms at the all-sources (root) level This means that
bare
would receive a composed GraphQL schema, rather than a bare and "translated" schema. If you do want to usebare
at the root level, your only choice is to opt into merger-bare, which lets transforms access the bare schemas; because it merges sources without wrapping them. This works when you don't have (or you take care of) conflicts between your sources, and you are not applying root-level transforms to data sources that already "speak" GraphQL.You are mixing transforms that support
bare
with transforms that don't Again,bare
mode always needs to access the bare schema. If you define other transforms that don't supportbare
mode, you will most likely have trouble, because those transforms will apply a wrapping layer that provides thebare
transforms, instead of the original bare schema.To take advantage of
bare
performance improvements, the suggestion here is to applywrap
transforms at the all-sources (root) level andbare
transforms within the data sources level; so you can reduce the number of wrapping layers that would otherwise be created if not usingbare
at all.
Example:
Copied to your clipboard{"sources": [{"name": "Countries","handler": {"soap": {"wsdl": "https://webservices.../wso?WSDL"}}},{"name": "Users","handler": {"openapi": {"source": "https://api.../swagger.yaml"}},"transforms": [{"rename": {"mode": "bare","renames": [{"from": {"type": "User","field": "lastName"},"to": {"type": "User","field": "surname"}}]}}]}],"merger": "bare","transforms": [{"rename": {"mode": "bare","renames": [{"from": {"type": "Country","field": "ISO-3166_Code"},"to": {"type": "Country","field": "code"}}]}}]}
Modes support
The table below illustrates how bare
and wrap
modes are supported across all transforms.
Transform | Bare | Wrap | Docs |
---|---|---|---|
Encapsulate | ❌ | ✅ | |
Federation | ❌ | ✅ | |
Filter Schema | ✅ | ✅ | |
Naming Convention | ❌ | ✅ | |
Prefix | ✅ | ✅ | |
Rename | ✅ | ✅ | |
Replace Field | ✅ | ❌ |